|
CRITICAL IDEAS
-
RADICAL
GRACE ... is a matter of consciousness-raising
coming from within each of us, ultimately suffusing the whole of embodied
human consciousness:
"We think it is likely that
the basic meanings revealed by these experiences, once they become potentiated into EHEs [i.e.,
once they become active agents for transforming the experiencers' identity, life
and worldview], is the
key to the evolution of consciousness and also to saving planet Earth because of
the types of changed consciousness that are associated with EHEs."
[Rhea A. White]
-
"POST"-DT-EHE
CHARACTERISTICS:
Kenneth
Ring and Evelyn
Elsaesser Valarino [in Lessons from the Light, 1998] offer a list of the most common characteristics of
those who have had NDEs, as observed in their and others' research.
They also appear to apply just as well to any / all types of
death-transcendent EHEs, and according to Rhea A. White, they apply to virtually anyone
who has had an EHE of any type. Paraphrasing these traits, NDErs
[and by inference, EHErs] ...
-
appreciate life more fully
-
experience increased feelings of self-worth
-
have a more compassionate regard for others
and, indeed, for all life
-
feel a heightened ecological sensitivity
-
experience a decreased interest in purely
materialistic and self-seeking values
-
tend to become more universalistic in religious
orientation
-
become more inclusive and spiritual in feeling
and expression
-
become aware their fear of death is most often
completely extinguished
-
have a deep-rooted conviction, based on their
direct experience, that some form of life after death awaits us, which
becomes unshakable and a source of enormous comfort
-
spontaneously experience or are aware of
increased powers of higher sense perception, increased psychic ability and
intuitive awareness, and/or the gift of healing
"In short," Ring and Valarino conclude,
"The NDE seems to unleash normally dormant aspects of the human potential
for higher consciousness and to increase one's capacity to relate more
sensitively to other persons and the world at large." Further,
their definitive research (and that of R. White, S. Brown, R. Moody, M. Morse
and others) suggests that the NDE (and indeed, many-to-all possible varieties of
EHEs) "… appears to promote the emergence of a type of functioning
suggestive of the full human potential that is presumably the birthright of all
of us. In a phrase, whenever the blessings of the NDE are fused
properly into one's life, the individual comes to exemplify what a highly
developed person would be and act like. Indeed, as I [Ring] have
tried to suggest in my earlier books, especially Heading
toward Omega and The
Omega Project, NDErs -- and others who have
undergone similar awakenings by other means -- may be the harbingers of
humanity's evolution toward higher consciousness. However, even if
this is true, it is clearly not enough to wait passively for this evolution to
occur. The phenomenon of the NDE, in my view, is not merely an
evolutionary catalyst but a teaching about life, love, and the human
potential that all interested persons could draw upon actively now in order to
enrich their lives and to hasten their own progress toward enlightenment."
Finally, one last note of interest that also
appears to be a consensus among most of the various EHE researchers,
including R. White and S. Brown, regarding all EHE populations is reflected in
one last comment by Ring and Valarino concerning NDErs: "… (W)e already have evidence that merely
learning about the NDE has effects similar to those reported by NDErs.
This means that the NDE may act like a benign virus, and by exposing
yourself to it, you can catch it; that is, you can experience some of the
same benefits as do those who actually have the NDE themselves.
Therefore, as we hear from those who have had NDEs and understand more
clearly just what they have gained from their encounter with the Light, you,
too, will have the opportunity to learn and grow as the NDEr
has. The aim of [Ken Ring's book, Lessons from the Light,
as well as this website and the work of numerous other students of EHEs,
such as Rhea White, Suzanne Brown], then, is simply to help you make these
connections for yourself in order to reap the rewards of NDEs without having
nearly to die first to do so."
-
EHE
AUTOBIOGRAPHY:
"[T]he act
[of writing an EHE autobiography] has value for society, and even for the planet as a whole.
This is
because we need a new story to make sense of who we are as human beings and
why we are here. The story of mechanistic, behavioristic science has
resulted in anomie, loss of meaning and connection, boredom, and the need for
ever more violent "kicks" and dangerous "highs," as in
drug abuse. In our society today there is a dangerous lack of reverence
towards other humans, other life forms, and life itself. Perhaps the
most practical thing we can do is write a better story. What better
place is there to begin than with ourselves? .... The big surprise
in all of this is that in writing about our most secret, intimate, personal
EHEs -- those that are uniquely our own -- we come to experience ourselves as
rooted in our common humanity and as connected to all life. ...
People who are centered in this experience are bound to live vastly different
lives than those who are bent and twisted by anger, doubt, fear, and pain,
such that their best hope is ... at worst,
to seek kicks in killing or maiming other humans or animals or to get lost in
drugs or pornography or crime." [Rhea
A. White]
"...
What we need is a story
that will unite science and spirituality, self and world. But first it
must occur at the individual level. ... Each of us needs a story that charges
our daily lives with meaning and puts us personally in touch with the sacred.
There are many books about writing or better yet, living one's own
story, one's own myth. But the myths of old contained an element that is
missing from most stories told today, and that is a link with the sacred.
Exceptional human experiences [and specifically, recording one's EHE-based
story] can serve as those links; they are those happenings in our lives that can
pull us out of boredom and disconnection into a world of meaning and
connection. We have to learn how to honor these experiences and let them
into our lives." [Rhea A. White]
-
MONISTIC
IDEALISM:
The philosophy that defines consciousness, not materiality, as the primary
reality. I don't know if this idea originally comes from Dr. Amit
Goswami or not -- does it? His work is what introduced me to the
concept.
-
PAN-EXPERIENTIALISM:
"This is the radical idea that sentience / consciousness is
inextricably and ontologically connected with matter all the way down. It is
written as a bold challenge to the dominant myth of reductive materialism
and its inherent pathological implications for our world. The primary
assumption that matter is only "dead" stuff , pushed around by
blind , external forces without purpose , has been our legacy for the past
400 years. From the fundamental assumptions of Bacon ,Newton,
Descartes,Darwin, etc., we have discarded any possibility for embodied mind,
the concept that matter has meaning, or is "ensouled."
"Although
panexperientialism is not a novel idea in the history of Western thought,
Dr. De Quincey is able to explain it with a new perspective and bring it
back to light, first, tracing its development throughout the great
philosophical thinkers of the past, and then, integrating quantum theory,
Arthur Young's epistemological theory, Whiteheadian process theory, and
lastly, the neo-Confucian ideas of Chu Hsi." [Source:
Nick Kondax's review on amazon.com of Christian De Quincey's book, Radical
Nature: Rediscovering the Soul of Matter, 2002.]
Further
commentary along this line comes from another reviewer of de Quincey's book,
Radical Nature, who only identifies hirself
as 'from Sunnyvale, CA, United States', re: "a
very old 'one substance' view of nature. Some draw backs are
that the author doesn't go enough into the more modern history of this
position. Panpsychism was a popular view in the
19th century and was the competing position to 'emergence' associated with
materialism. I find materialistic emergence as a non-sense
doctrine when it comes to things like consciousnes, others like Ernst Hackel
and William Clifford found it unsatisfactory as an underlying philosophy for
Darwinian evolution, preferring the panpsychist alternative
instead. In the early twentieth century the debate between
panpsychists and materialists was cut short as the supposedly
anti-metaphysical philosophy of logical positivism / empiricism became
dominant. Later on as positivism fell out of favor, materialism
became the fall back position in many sciences. Ironically, the
twentieth century also witnessed the death of classical physics with the
advent of quantum theory, and QT is compatible with a panpsychist world
view."
-----------------------------------------------
Other useful onsite reference material for
wHeretwoworldsTouch.com:
|
LLR MENU
|||||
_________________
WADING
IN:
_________________
_________________
FULL SUBMERSION:
_______________
LIVING THE
AWAKENED LIFE:
______________
SPOTLIGHTS:
_________________
OH!
AND...
_________________
F Y I ...
_________________
SUPPORT OUR SITE:
|