Welcome HOME to
wHeretwoworldsTouch
 
*   *    *    *    *
 
WHAT'S NEW
 
LANGUAGE
PREFERENCE
 
wHere.. 
CONTENT GATEWAY
 
SITEMAP
 
[Google Site Search]
 
------------
 
MY wtwT
PERSONAL PAGE
 
-----------------
 
THE PHYSICAL
DEATH AND DYING
RESOURCE PORTAL
 
THE LARGER LIFE
REALITY PORTAL
 
LIVING THE
AWAKENED LIFE
 
THE EHEer SUPPORT
COOPERATIVE
 
  THE 
  DEATH-TRANSCENDENT   
COOPERATIVE INQUIRY
INITIATIVE
 
-------------------
 
GENDER EXPERIMENT
 
CONNECT 
WITH OTHERS
 
MUSIC
 
ART GALLERY
 
JUST PLAIN 
FUN STUFF
 
--------------------
 
CONTACT US
 
HELP US WITH
OUR WISH LIST
 
COPYRIGHT
POLICY
 
PRIVACY
POLICY
 
CREDITS

 

 

The Death-Transcendent co-operative Inquiry Initiative

 

DEDICATION TO JOHN HERONTHE DT-CII PROJECTS

OFF-SITE RESEARCHDATA SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION

 

[[This needs more work, especially re:  the quotes.  

But basic ideas here.]]

RUDOLF STEINER

 

 

 

 

 

What follows comes from Handbook for Groups and Branches [By and/or For?] the Anthroposophical Society in America. ... FOOD FOR THOUGHT:  How might we relate to or within this organization or use its inspiration as a model for our own pursuits without being bound to an outside organization ..??

THE SCHOOL FOR SPIRITUAL SCIENCE

Henry Barnes

At Christmas, 1923, Rudolf Steiner proposed that the Anthroposophical Society should take a courageous, far-reaching step. He suggested that the Society, as it had existed since 1912-1913, when it emerged as an independent association from the Theosophical Society, of which it had formerly been part – should throw off every vestige of sectarianism and come to know itself as an absolutely open, public society. Every human being was welcome into this Society if she or he recognized that spiritual science, grounded in anthroposophy, was a valid contribution to our time. Membership in this Society required no adherence to any philosophical, scientific, artistic, or religious principles. It was to be “an association of

people whose will it is to nurture the life of the soul, both in the individual and in human society, on the basis of a true knowledge of the spiritual world”¹.

Yet, at the heart of such a public society, an institution was to be placed which was intended to be an esoteric school, or university, based on spiritual-scientific knowledge and research.  The education offered in this school, and the research it was, and is, to develop are subject to the same rigorous disciplines which govern every objective search for knowledge. But, as already stated, its methods are grounded in spiritual science rather than in the natural sciences as we have come to know them today.

In its structure, the School for Spiritual Science resembles the structure of the traditional universities that have come down to us from earlier times. The student enters a general section – similar to the philosophical faculty in a traditional school – in which she or he

seeks to attain the capacities of spiritual-scientific cognition described in the works of Rudolf Steiner. Fundamental in these capacities is a clarity and activity of thought capable of grasping ideas derived from supersensible observation. Such clear thinking can lead, step by step, to cognition that is no longer dependent on the physical organism. Body-free thought can then be enhanced through consistent spiritual-scientific practice to three stages of higher

cognition, described by Rudolf Steiner in such basic works as How to Know Higher Worlds: A Modern Path of Initiation², as imagination, inspiration and intuition. Each of these stages leads the student to a new level of experience of supersensible or spiritual reality.

This central core is known in the School for Spiritual Science as the General Anthroposophical Section which was intended by Rudolf Steiner to consist of three esoteric Classes. Unfortunately, due to Rudolf Steiner’s illness and subsequent death March 30, 1925, he was only able to inaugurate the first of these three Classes. The nineteen lessons of the First Class were held by Rudolf Steiner from February 15 to August 2, 1924, in Dornach.

Upon his return form England in September, he had hoped to present the second part of the First Class, which would have been followed by a third part, all of which would have then been followed by the institution of a Second Class and, eventually, by a Third Class.

 

The cognitive capacitates to be achieved by the student through spiritual-scientific training in the three core Classes were capacitates that he or she could apply to the fructification of the branch of cultural and vocational practice in which she or he was engaged. Thus the artist, scientist, teacher, physician, etc. who wished to work in a chosen field out of the spiritual-scientific insight could call on the capacities awakened and exercised as a pupil in the Classes of the School and thus enliven and deepen his or her work in a given professional discipline.

And the opportunity to cultivate these vocational insights and skills might be developed in collegial work within a particular Section of the School, just as the student in a traditional university, having achieved the basic skills of scholarship in a central philosophical faculty,

could enter a medical, legal, pedagogical graduate school for further specialized training.

In this way, Rudolf Steiner conceived of a circle of cultural, vocationally-oriented “schools” or “sections” surrounding a centrally human developmental, anthroposophical, or spiritual-scientific

core. The method by means of which he called these special Sections into existence was, in itself, also fundamentally human, rather than theoretical or bureaucratic in any way. He did not proceed by deciding that a medical or an educational section was needed and then set out to search for a qualified individual to lead the endeavor. On the

contrary, he first recognized that such an individual was already there and had proven themselves capable, creative and reliable in a particular field. As a result of this recognition, he saw that a section, or division of the School, could be established because the qualified

person was already there. Having worked closely with Ita Wegman in the medical field, for example, he could establish a Medical Section under her leadership because she was there.

In this way, during the Christmas Foundation Meeting, and in the weeks and months that followed, Rudolf Steiner was able to bring the School for Spiritual Science into existence with the specialized Sections surrounding the central developmental core. Anthroposophy,

or the methods of spiritual science, was to provide the creative, transformative energies that could enliven the School as a whole.

In this way it was intended that the School for Spiritual Science should be the sustaining heart of the community of individuals who came together in the General Anthroposophical Society to create a home for Anthroposophia, the being whose help is so urgently needed today.

* * * * * * * * * * *

How can one become a member of the School and how does the School fulfill its function within the General Anthroposophical Society at the present time?

An individual who “considers as justified the existence of an institution such as the Goetheanum in Dornach, in its capacity as a School for Spiritual Science”³ may become a member of the Anthroposophical Society. In doing so, one undertakes no obligation other than those one has already accepted as a member of the Anthroposophical Society. In doing so, one undertakes no obligation to help the individual in every way it can find access to the sources of spiritual-scientific insight.

 

If, after a period of time – usually two years or more – the individual member comes to feel that he or she wishes not only to receive the insights of spiritual science, but is ready and wants to represent anthroposophy in some way, this signals a new relationship to

anthroposophy and to the Anthroposophical Society. One has been a “quiet,” receiving member, who is now ready and willing to become “active” on behalf of the anthroposophical movement. One is now ready to share responsibility for the movement that – through Rudolf Steiner’s deed at Christmas 1923 – united itself with the Anthroposophical Society. The readiness to represent anthroposophy – in no matter how modest or quiet a way – is the indication that the moment has come to consider becoming an active member – a pupil – in the School, which also means joining the work of the First Class.

The individual who finds him or herself at such a point should ask several questions. Have I a clear understanding of how Rudolf Steiner characterized the Society and the School? His essays and letter to the members following the Christmas meeting are a primary help in

gaining this clarity. A second question should also be asked. Have I enough experience in meditation to be confident that I can sustain a meditative relationship with the esoteric material of the Class? Am I able, and willing to work with my sisters and brothers, as members of the School, independent of personal sympathies and antipathies? Am I, in other words, ready to put my own “karmic” house in order and strive for objectivity and a genuine openness toward those with whom I am now asking to join? These self-directed questions are summed up in the basic question: Am I ready, able and willing to represent

anthroposophy in an undogmatic, unsectarian, but honest and unambiguous way? And, beyond this, am I prepared to share, through my own work and experience, in the task of research, even though I may be far from having achieved supersensible perception?

If one answers these questions with an honestly positive confidence that one is ready to become an “active member”, the next step is to seek out a Class Holder and discuss the matter openly with him or her. If you do not know an authorized representative of the School, the Society’s office staff can give you the name of such an individual whom you might contact. If you find yourself confirmed in your sense that joining the School is the right step for you at this time, the further procedure is uncomplicated. You write a letter, addressed to the Executive Council (Vorstand) at the Goetheanum in Dornach, stating how long you have been a member of the Society, your immediate life situation, and your reason() for wishing to enter the School. You give this letter to the authorized representative with whom you spoke, and she or he forwards your letter to Dornach with an endorsement based

on the personal contact that has been achieved. The final decision rests with the Vorstand and the membership card in the School and the class is issued by the Goetheanum.

As a member of the School, you are then eligible to join a Section in whose work you are actively involved. The different Sections have somewhat differing procedures for joining them and, again, the Society’s office in Ann Arbor can help identify a Section representative

whom you can consult. The Sections represented in North America have recently come together as a working group, known as the Collegium, listed below. The current Section leaders at the Goetheanum are also listed.

 

In the seventy-five years of the School’s existence, one circumstance has changed radically. The esoteric lessons as Rudolf Steiner gave them in 1924 are now available in print. They were first published in German and also now in English translation. Under these conditions

one may well ask: why should I join the School if the Class tests are otherwise available?

This is a question each of us must ultimately answer for oneself. Certain thoughts, however, may be shared. Rudolf Steiner made it clear that the inner reality of an esoteric test lies in its oral

transmission, far less in the printed text. There is also the aspect of commitment by individuals who freely decide to join a community of responsible representatives on behalf of anthroposophy and of Anthroposophia. And, with this commitment, also the destiny

relation with Rudolf Steiner. Even just the outer form of meeting with others at an appointed time, within a rhythmic sequence, and in a mood of sincere respect and earnestness is also a reality. Nevertheless, the fact of publication almost certainly requires

even greater activity on our part as members to transmute the objective weakening of esoteric discipline.

NOTES:

1. Paragraph 1, Statutes of the General Anthroposophical Society

2. How to Know Higher Worlds: A Modern Path of Initiation ( Hudson , NY : Anthroposophic Press, 1994).

3. From Paragraph 4, Statutes of the General Anthroposophical Society

4. The Foundation Stone/The Life, Nature and Cultivation of Anthroposophy ( London : Rudolf Steiner Press, 1996); The Constitution of the School of Spiritual Science, ( London : Anthroposophical Society in Great Britain , 1980).

 

 

do something like this, re:  R. Steiner:

 

John Heron:

Emerging self-determination in the religious sphere is, in my worldview, the sign of immanent spiritual life at work at a breakthrough level, not as in the past when this or that religious innovator started a modified version of Christianity or Buddhism or some other traditional creed, but in large numbers of ordinary people generating their own lived inquiry into religious practice and deep inner transformation.  My sense of it is that there are three interrelated criteria which, applying in varying degrees to any one individual, identify people in this self-generating spiritual culture:

  •  

They affirm their own original relation to the presence of creation, find spiritual authority within and do not project it outward onto teachers, traditions or texts.

  •  

They are alert to the hazards of defensive and offensive spirituality, in which unprocessed emotional distress distorts spiritual development, either by denying parts of one's nature, or by making inflated claims in order to manipulate others.

  •  

There are open to genuine dialogue about spiritual beliefs and to collaborative decision-making about spiritual practices undertaken together.  

                                                        ~~John Heron (1998)

 

 

 

 

DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS, RE:  R. STEINER AND DT-CII:

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOHN HERON'S IDEAS AND 

THE DEATH-TRANSCENDENT CO-OPERATIVE INQUIRY INITIATIVE

Some relevant / important features about co-operative Inquiry as a discipline, as given from the back of Heron's book, Sacred Science:

  • The emergence of a self-generating spiritual culture of independent pathfinders.

  • an affirmation of the person as a real spiritual presence on the crest of divine becoming.

  • The nature of long-term lived inquiry, and of short-term co-operative inquiry, into the spiritual and the subtle.

  • A radical account of what happens when inner spiritual authority is projected outward on to traditions, texts and teachers, with an expose of the authoritarianism in spiritual traditions.

  • A critique of the gender-laden theory of a perennial philosophy.

  • A practical, working model of internal spiritual authority, to dialogue with the reader's working model.

  • An exploration of the issues involved in do-it-yourself subtle [psychical] research.

  • A provisional new dipolar map of the spiritual and the subtle, and a critique of other maps.

  • A new classification of methods of inner transformation, and a critique of a traditional Buddhist approach.

  • Reports of eleven short-term co-operative inquiries into the spiritual and the subtle, showing how the method works.

  • A presentation of a participatory worldview, with the paradigm of participatory inquiry and a sketch of a dipolar theology of embodiment.

 

 

 

 

DT-CII NEWS

DT-CII SITEMAP

DT-CII GRAND EXP. FORUM

DT-CII FEATURE COLUMN

DT-CII GUEST COLUMN

FRESH

DT-CII LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT!

DT-CII INTERACTIVES

DT-CII HOMEPAGES

DT-CII CONTACT US

DEDICATION TO JOHN HERON

ABOUT JOHN HERON

ABOUT RUDOLF STEINER AND THE SCHOOL OF SPIRITUAL SCIENCE

DT-CII  JABBERWOCK, EXERCISES, TOOLS

DT-CII BOOKS +

DT-CII PROJECTS

OFF-SITE RESEARCH

DT-CII SURVEYS

DT-CII DATA SUMMARY, DISCUSSION

 

 

  
 Best viewed [View / Text Size / Smaller [or Medium]